The Future Watch
Donate Here to Support The Future Watch
Home Threat Board Archives About The Future Watch Why Donate Contact Us


Table of Contents:

-The Drake Equation and what it may mean for us

-Possible catastrophic events

-Ways to prevent catastrophe

-Columns

-The Survival Plan

-Possible utopias

-Possible dystopias

-Book recommendations

-Movie recommendations

-Future technology

-Free literature

-Personal survival

-Survival Gear

-Public forum

-Links


How Good Things Hurt You

"Be careful what you wish for - you might get it," is a well-known saying that seems particularly preminiscent if we look at many of the problems the world faces today.  We have become addicted to many good things - oil, technological advancement, and government largess - just to name a few.  These are things that have allowed for enormous improvements in the human condition, yet also have lead to problems that may destroy all that we have gained.

Oil provides the perfect example of the dangers of addiction.  Oil is a remarkable fluid with several praiseworthy properties.  It exists in large quantity. It has a high energy content, and thus provides a cheap, portable fuel.  It is an excellent lubricant.  It can be used to make plastic.  It has played a pivotal role in virtually every important advance our species has made during the past century.  One could almost view it as God's gift to Man - the substance that allowed us to go from sailing wooden ships and driving horse drawn carts to landing a man on the moon and instantly sharing information with someone half a world away over the Internet.  As an added bonus, large amounts of oil are located in many under-developed regions of the world - thus giving those regions a source of income with which to develop.

Oil is so useful, however, that we've developed a very harmful dependency on it.  It is so valuable that the under-developed regions of the world where it is located have had their growth stunted by the good fortune it's brought them.  The money made from oil has kept dictatorships in power, funded wars, and caused civil strife.  The effects of the money made from oil in these countries have frequently been so negative that many of the countries might have been better off without oil.

The negative effects of oil dependency have not been limited to under-developed regions, however.  The Western world spends billions of dollars buying oil, and then spends billions more propping up the governments of the countries that sell it.  Some of the dollars spent on oil end up in the hands of terrorists, and then the West spends even more money combating terrorism.  Of course, each extra dollar spent on these activities means one less dollar that is available to be spent developing the technologies necessary to end the world's oil addiction. 

Beyond these negative effects, there are also a couple of negatives that are inherent to oil itself. 
Burning it releases CO2, and, because of the amount of oil (and coal) we've burned, we've released enough CO2 to make important changes in the atmosphere of our planet - changes that are affecting global weather systems, mostly to our detriment.  Furthermore, the global supply of oil is limited - and running out while we're still dependent on it would have disastrous effects.

Oil is not the only good thing that we've become dangerously dependent on, however.  It's become increasingly popular in the West for citizens to vote themselves money from the public treasuries.  Voters support candidates who offer new tax cuts or new government programs to distribute money to deserving folks.  Many of the tax cuts are intended to stimulate economic growth, and many of the government programs are created for good reasons (to take care of the poor or elderly, to provide health care, etc.), but the net effect has been to create a burden of increasingly high debt for future generations.  In the U.S., this practice has grown particularly obscene through the growth of "earmarking" (a way for just one politician to allocate government money to just one constituency in just one district).  Political parties who support new government programs or tax cuts buy votes for the whole party.  With earmarks, a politician can spend government money to buy votes for just himself. 

Of course, there are a few voices of reason who oppose the fiscal insanity of spending trillions of tomorrow's money to buy votes today, but Western voters are now used to getting money from the government, so they're rarely willing to support a candidate who doesn't promise to pay them for their votes.  As a consequence, the West has entered a vicious cycle where government largess mounts to increasingly dangerous levels, yet any candidate who says as much is defeated by a less pessimistic candidate who promises another tax cut or government program.

The world is also beginning to show signs of being dangerously addicted to scientific and technological advancement.  This is a bold statement because during the past couple of centuries scientific advancements have allowed for incredible improvements in life expectancy, wealth, education, opportunities, and almost every other measure of human welfare.  That said, society has become used to relying on scientific advancement to the point that we have willingly created problems that we require new advancements to solve (think climate change or sustainably feeding 6 billion plus people).  In fact, scientific advancement has proven to be so clearly a good thing, that we support continued advancement (and consider it inevitable) almost without thought.

This situation is leading us toward some potential problems.  Our improved knowledge of biology is opening the door to genetically engineered viruses that may be far more contagious and lethal than anything in nature.  Advances in computer technology may make humans obsolete - even for thinking.  In Europe, physicists at the CERN accelerator are planning an experiment that may have a very very small chance of destroying the Earth, or, just possibly the entire universe.  And these are just a handful of the dangers we face from advancing technology.  Unfortunately, however, we've become so reliant on scientific progress, that the public normally isn't even aware of the possible pitfalls.

None of this means that we should support a backlash against oil, government programs or science.  All of these things have done a lot of good in the past, and will continue to do good in the future.  That said, we should probably begin looking gift horses in the mouth, and being a little more cautious before we become dependent on something.  Sometimes having a good thing can be worse than not having it.

Related Links:

Catastrophic Events

The Drake Equation

The Survival Plan

Move Recommendations
Slashdot   Slashdot It!

Seed Newsvine